The Fault in Themselves: How China and Other Countries Contributed to the COVID-19 Pandemic

WHO press conference declaring COVID-19 a pandemic

Men at some time are masters of their fates;
The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars,
But in ourselves, that we are underlings.

(Julius Caesar, Act I, Scene III, L. 140-141)

The COVID-19 pandemic, generating cases and deaths daily, has impacted all parts of the world. Australia, along with the USA, proposed an independent inquiry into the origins and responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. This has generated backlash from China which placed economic sanctions on Australia. Recently, the World Health Assembly passed a resolution calling all stakeholders to respond to and find the source of the pandemic. An inquiry was included in the resolution, but it would mainly focus on WHO’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic at the expense of the responses of individual countries, including China, as outlined in the excerpt below (emphasis mine):

…Initiate, at the earliest appropriate moment, and in consultation with Member States, a stepwise process of impartial, independent and comprehensive evaluation, including using existing mechanisms, as appropriate, to review experience gained and lessons learned from the WHO-coordinated international health response to COVID-19, including (i) the effectiveness of the mechanisms at WHO’s disposal; (ii) the functioning of the IHR and the status of implementation of the relevant recommendations of the previous IHR Review Committees; (iii) WHO’s contribution to United Nations-wide efforts; and (iv) the actions of WHO and their timelines pertaining to the COVID-19 pandemic, and make recommendations to improve global pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response capacity, including through strengthening, as appropriate, WHO’s Health Emergencies Programme…

Focusing mainly at WHO’s response to the pandemic overlooks the important roles that countries have played in perpetuating the COVID-19 pandemic. A lot of blame is placed on China for not reporting the seriousness of the pandemic in a timely manner, but other countries must also share the blame for not preparing for the pandemic. In this blog post, I will explain the International Health Regulations (IHRs), a legal document that enforces countries to be prepared and responsive to disease outbreaks and pandemics. I will then explain how China and other countries such as the USA have violated the principles and rules of the IHRs to cause a pandemic that could not be contained.

Continue reading

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19: Studies

Picture of different kinds of clinical research

Disclaimer: This blog post is written for informational purposes only. It does not provide medical advice. If you are concerned about COVID-19, including the use of drugs against COVID-19, please seek advice from an accredited medical professional.

In the last blog post, I introduced chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine and how they are used to treat malaria, rheumatoid arthritis and SLE. I also explained how these drugs can produce many side effects which explains why medical professionals need to conduct regular health checks when prescribing these drugs to their patients. In this blog post, we will explore the in vitro (cellular) and in vivo (human) studies of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 and explain how more detailed studies are required to show whether these drugs can be used to treat COVID-19.

Continue reading

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19: Background

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine tablets, carried by a doctor.

The COVID-19 pandemic has spread globally, not only producing a huge number of cases and deaths but also massively impacting all areas of daily life. As of this blog post, there are currently no approved vaccines and treatments for COVID-19. Existing drugs are tested to see if it can treat COVID-19, including chloroquine and its chemical relative hydroxychloroquine. Despite no sound evidence that they are effective against COVID-19, Donald Trump’s endorsement of these drugs has led some countries to produce and stockpile these drugs to combat COVID-19 and deaths due to self-medication of chloroquine. At the same time, patients that need these drugs to control their conditions fear that they will not be able to obtain them, leading to restrictions on who can prescribe and use these drugs and when these drugs can be used to treat COVID-19.

Over the next two blog posts, I will be talking about the science behind chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine and why their use in COVID-19 is controversial. In this blog post, I will talk about what chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are, what diseases they treat and their side effects. In the next blog post, I will describe the studies on chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 and argue that more comprehensive studies are needed to fully test their effectiveness.

Continue reading

The differences between COVID-19 and seasonal influenza: a virus perspective

Electron microscopic images of coronaviruses (left) and influenza viruses (right).

The COVID-19 pandemic, driven by a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), has spread rapidly around the world. Some people (and even global leaders in the USA and Brazil) mistakenly believe that COVID-19 infection is just seasonal influenza as they produce similar symptoms. You might have even tried to convince some of your relatives that COVID-19 infection is different to that of seasonal flu. You also know that COVID-19 is more contagious and deadlier than seasonal influenza.

In this blog post, I will be taking a different tack on the issue. I will be comparing the viruses themselves to show you how COVID-19 is similar and different to seasonal influenza. This blog post will describe what these viruses are, where they come from and how they infect and cause disease. I hope that this blog post will give you a new way to persuade other people that COVID-19 is different from seasonal influenza.

Continue reading

How does the immune system respond to COVID-19 infection? Explaining the article “Breadth of concomitant immune responses prior to patient recovery: a case report of non-severe COVID-19”

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the novel SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, has massive global ramifications. As of 1st April 2020, the pandemic has produced 858,785 cases with 42,151 deaths. The pandemic has stretched hospitals and public health systems in developed countries such as Italy and the United States and also affected local and global economies with travel restrictions, falling stock prices and rising unemployment. Researchers around the world are studying the SARS-CoV-2 virus and COVID-19 infection to develop treatments and vaccines that can stop the pandemic. In particular, researchers are looking into how the immune system responds to COVID-19 infection.

Recently, researchers at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity in Melbourne, Australia published an article which described, for the first time, how the immune system responds to COVID-19 infection. In this study, researchers tracked the immune response of a patient who was hospitalised with COVID-19 infection but later recovered. They found that the patient was able to mount an effective immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 virus that persisted even after the virus was eliminated.

I like this article because it describes very simply how the immune system responds to COVID-19 infection. In addition, the article is quite short and contains results that, with further explanation, anyone can interpret and understand. In this blog post, I will explain how the immune system works and how this relates to what researchers found in their study. I hope this blog post will ignite your interest in the immune system and how it responds to COVID-19 infection. Who knows, you might even start reading and understanding some academic articles on COVID-19 infection!

Continue reading